K-GA FUEL DISPENSER

K-GA FUEL DISPENSER

Pump Type :Optional

Inlet Pressure :>=54kPa.

Flow rate (L/min.): 55±5

Suction Distance (m) :6(verticalmente) / 50(orizzontalmente)

FlowMeter Type : Optional

Accuracy : ±0.2%

Motor Voltage(V): 110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp) :1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle :Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition :-40~~+55degree

Control Type :Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset : Function Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter) :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price: 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume :0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer :1~~9,999,999

Hose :4.5m

Weight :280kg

Dimension(L×W×H) : 1180*650*2020(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container : 40ft: 29

ents on metrological management. The chapter briefly introduces fuel dispenser’s metrological management and technical requirements, appraisal fuel dispenser related and attentions. Article I Metrological management and technical requirements In accordance with The Law on Metrology of fuel dispenser’s legal management mainly includes following aspects: Model approval, initial approval, subsequent appraisal and inspection in operation. Model approval refers to an entire test, examination and assessment as to new model’s entire performance. Initial approval refers to assess whether or not the fuel dispenser made by manufacturer in accordance with the model having been ratification through a series of testing, as well as metrological performance with relative metrological rules and regulations. Initial approval really has two phases �- approval combined with factory test, and testing appraisal after installation. Subsequent appraisal is conducted after long time since initial appraisal, from which consider fuel dispenser able appraisal period is set down according to related requirements. Periodical appraisal is also regarded as the continued subsequent appraisal. Fuel dispenser’s measuring performance within appraisal period needs to be examined, so filling station should deploy self-check standard instrument (no less than 20L) to examine and inspect. Apart from applied to fue fuel dispenser l dispenser approval, JJG443-98 also adapt sample testing and pattern evaluation. Although there are two items of accuracy and flow distance ratio conducted in initial approval and subsequent evaluation, there are other technical parameters different from approval as for fuel dispenser made after passing pattern evaluation, including minimum calculated volume and minimum cubic variable. Several items reference to the pattern evaluation and sampling testing of mechanical hydraulic section of fuel dispenser as followed: Accuracy testing The testing’s purpose is to define the flow curve and verify the tolerance scope in which the allowed maximum tol

us others as　　 required　　Sagem　　 STS supplied drivers　　 Not just Debit Credit　　 Debit Cr fuel dispenser edit driver in many regions　　 Will justify result in infrastructure being put　　 in place　　 Other drivers in regions where fraud not　　 such an issue　　 EMV is a global standard for any Smart　　 Card based product　　 Including non financial products　　 Not Just Retail　　 EMV across industry applicability - anywhere Smart　　 Cards arecould be used　　 Financial Services (Banking Building Societies Dealing　　 Insurance)　　 Hospitality　　 Government Central or Local　　 Utilities　　 Not just point of sale　　 Kiosk　　 ATM　　 Wireless could also be at the point of sale　　 GasPetrol Stations　　 Bank Teller　　 Mobiles　　 Internet　　 Internet　　 fuel dispenser Shopping　　 EMV Transaction Service Merchant Webs erver:　　 C ons um er PC : H TTPS　　 H TTPS C lient D etection　　 W fuel dispenser eb Brow s er　　 ETS Interface　　Sm artcard R eader　　 Thin C lient　　 C ons um er Web　　 Merchant Interface (Authoris ation)　　 Server　　 Server　　 Subm is s ion　　

ntry block based on Brazil and Argentina. At Brazil s invitation, Venezuela is negotiating full membership of Mercosur. Yet Mr Chávez is stir fuel dispenser ring up trouble in that group too. If Mercosur “had to die�for something better to emerge, so be it, he said at a meeting with two of its presidents last month. Lula s response to Mr Morales s decree was conciliatory. After an emergency cabinet meeting, he said Bolivia was within its sovereign rights. He invited Mr Morales, together with Mr Chávez and Argentina s president, Néstor Kirchner, to emergency talks on May 4th. But Bolivia s alliance with Venezuela, and its bullying of Petrobras, amount to a clear snub to Brazil. Mr Morales may yet revert to a more pragmatic course. But his alliance with Mr Chávez and Mr Castro, even more than the nationalisation, sends a worrying signal that Bolivia may be moving backwards towards statist nationalism. If that is so, all the precedents suggest that while its government may get richer, its people are li fuel dispenser kely to grow even poorer. © 2006 . Canada A practical man May 4th 2006 | OTTAWA AND VANCOUVER From The Economist print edition The prime minister settles a trade dispute and offers a tax-cutting budget Get article background HIS brusque and bossy manner means that Stephen Harper may never win the affection of fuel dispenser Canadians. But after three months as prime minister, the Conservative leader is winning respect as a politician who gets things done. The past few days brought two examples of that. On April 27th, Mr Harper announced a surprise settlement of a protracted trade war with the United States over softwood lumber. Five days later, his finance minister, Jim Flaherty, presented a budget which won applause for lowering taxes without sacrificing fiscal discipline. To some Canadians, the lumber deal looked like surrender. In 2002, for the fourth time since 1982, the United States levied countervailing duties on exports of wood from Canada, its partner in