S-G22 FUEL DISPENSER

S-G22 FUEL DISPENSER

Pump Type: Optional

Inlet Pressure :>=54kPa.

Flow rate (L/min.): 55±5

Suction Distance (m) :6(verticalmente) / 50(orizzontalmente)

FlowMeter Type :Optional

Accuracy :±0.2%

Motor Voltage(V) :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp) :1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage : 110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle: Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition : -40~~+55degree

Control Type : Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset : Function Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter) :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume :0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer :1~~9,999,999

Hose: 4.5m

Weight :247kg.

Dimension(L×W×H) : 1160*560*2215(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container : 40ft: 27

ping a little oil flow out of corrugated pipe, put a container under it. The method is suggested to be applicable to other maintenance of hydraulic components. Article VI Solenoid valve In this Article a switch, controlled by electric components, is installed at inlet or outlet of measurement transducer, which is used for ensure the accuracy of presetting filling volume of fuel dispenser. Nozzle cannot be closed after finishing presetting volume due to the inertia of pump and pressured oil, which results in that real volume exceed presetting volume so as to affect fuel dispenser’s accur fuel dispenser fuel dispenser acy. In order to prevent this phenomenon occurring, most of manufacturers of fuel dispenser adopt to mount a solenoid valve at inlet or outlet of measurement transducer, switching off valve prior to presetting volume getting reach through regulating appropriate ahead volume. The method is one of the most efficient measures that used for ensuring fuel dispenser’s acc fuel dispenser uracy and preventing overrun resulted from the inertia of pump and pressure oil. There are two kinds of solenoid vale --- membrane type and piston type. The former, simple structure and high anti—pollution, is closed through membrane. However, its performance is depended upon the technology about membrane and weather. The latter valve controlled through piston has wide applicable range of temperature, weak to anti-jammed pollution. Double flux solenoid valve is controlled by the position movement of cam that is driven by motor, and large or small flux is realized through the open or closed of main or vice valve. It has merits of wide applicable temperature range, high pollution-resistant. At present, most manufacturers adopt double flux membrane solenoid valve in fuel dispenser. Double flux solenoid valve Structure and working principle Membrane solenoid valve is widely adopted recently, which also called double flux solenoid valve, shown in Diagram 2-35 and 2-36. Diagram 2-35: Working principle of double flux solenoid valve Diagram 2-36:

Pad　　 Car Wash　　 BNA　　 FP1 FP2　　 COPT　　 FP3　　 Receipt　　 COPT　　 Printer　　Feb 06 Page 17　　 Cost Comparison　　 Tradition fuel dispenser fuel dispenser al　　 Intelligent customer operated terminals ? ?$ 12k each　　 forecourt cabling (data) $ 2k　　 installation (+disruption time - a day) $ 1.5k　　 IFSF　　 Dumb devices and sw modules $ 5k　　 device cabling ? about a metre $ 100　　 fuel dispenser Installation (4 hours) $ 400　　 Similar economics for other devices　　 Tank gauge and controller Loyalty terminals RFID Vehicle　　 Identification etc.　　Feb 06 Page 18　　 Innovation versus Implementation　　 There is an argument that says that Standards　　 are a barrier to innovation　　 Is this true or is it the way we approach　　 implementation of new ideas?　　 IFSF is an Infrastructure not a protocol　　 Consider an innovative area remote　　 maintenance　　 One independent application versus proprietary per device　　 Integrated with IXRetail REMC standard　　 Marketing initiatives based on IFSF and　　 modular software can be rapidly implemented 19　　Feb 06 Page　　

he Molotov-Ribbentrop tradition� The Poles want the EU to develop an energy pact, similar to NATO, in which all EU countries pledge to come to each other s aid in times of energy crisis. Other EU countries have their own concerns. The British, who like to lecture other countries about the need to be open to global capital, have been fretting about the possibility that Gazprom may make a bid to take over Centrica, which controls much of Britain s gas infrastructure. Any such bid would certainly test the British commitment to open markets. The Italians are uneasily aware of their depend fuel dispenser fuel dispenser ence on Russian energy, but have been too distracted by internal political turmoil to do much about it. The French, because of the strength of their nuclear industry, feel less vulnerable. As for the EU authorities in Brussels, they are working on an energy-policy document for the June 2006 summit of EU heads of state. On May 2nd the commission sent a letter to fuel dispenser Victor Khristenko, the Russian energy minister, promising that the rules applied to Gazprom would be no different from those that apply to other companies in the EU energy market. Yet the letter also restated the importance of ratifying the Energy Charter Treaty, a political initiative which stipulates the right for foreigners to use pipelines. So far, the Russians do not seem remotely tempted to sign—a stance which only heightens fears within the EU that one day Russian gas may become a political weapon. EU countries could respond by importing more liquefied natural gas (LNG). And they can build new routes like the Nabucco pipeline, which would bring gas from Turkey via Bulgaria, Romania and Hungary. Yet LNG terminals and new pipelines take years to build. They are expensive too the estimated cost of the Nabucco project is $5 billion. © 2006 . Siemens Nip, tuck May 4th 2006 | FRANKFURT From The Economist print edition One of Europe s finest conglomerates needs more radical surgery KLAUS KLEINFELD