U406 Breakaway

U406 Breakaway

The U406 is designed to be installed on fuel dispensing hoses,and will separate when subjected to a designed pull force. The dual valves seat automatically, stopping the flow of fuel and limiting any fuel spillage, while protecting the dispensing equipment. For proper operation, the U406-A/B should be installed with a "straightening" hose with a minimum length of 9". U406-C/D should be installed with a minimum length of 12" .

Materials:

Body: Aluminum

Main Seals: Viton

Main Spring: stainless steel

Guide and poppet: POM

Protective Sleeve: PVC

Features:

Pull force- the U406 will break away with a pull force of 250 lbs ±5%, the U406 will break away with a pull force of 300 lbs±5%.

Certainty of operation- designed to be replaced after separation, instead of reassembled, to protect against reassembly errors.

Unique double-poppet design-features low pressure drop.

Flow rate: 0-60L/Min(3/4")

0-120L/Min(1")

Working pressure: 0.18Mpa

Low pressure drop- the integral check valve design allows for minimal pressure drop for faster, high-volume fill-ups.

100% Factory Tested.

Package:

Product ID Net Weight Cross Weight Sizet

U406-A 23kg/case of 100 26kg/case of 100 26.8x48x26 cm /case of 100

U406-B 23kg/case of 100 26kg/case of 100 26.8x48x26 cm /case of 100

U406-C 19kg/case of 50 22kg/case of 50 29x29x30 cm /case of 50

U406-D 19kg/case of 50 22kg/case of 50 29x29x30 cm /case of 50

model, double model and multi-nozzle fuel dispenser (see Diagram 1-8, 1-9 ). The two categories of suction fuel dispenser and submersible fuel dispenser is divided by pump position. Diagram 1-15: Mobile fuel dispenser Diagram 1-16: Vehicle-mounted fuel dispenser Diagram 1-17; Hanging filling system Diagram 1-18: Card-controlled fuel dispenser In addition, according to special ancillary function, there are mobile fuel dispenser (Diagram 1-15), vehicle-mounted fuel dispenser (Diagram1-16), hanging filing system (Diagram1-17), fuel dispenser with vapor recovery device (Diagram1-7), mixed product fuel dispenser available to change product label (Diagram1-10), fuel dispenser communicated with upper networ fuel dispenser k (Diagram1-12), fuel dispenser subject to upper network (Diagram1-11), card-controlled fuel dispenser (Diagram1-18), etc. Article IV Basic working principle and configuration of fuel dispenser Basic working principle. The basic working principle of fuel dispenser can be illustrated by the following chart 1-19, the line with arrow presenting flow direction of oil, line denoting the transmission direction of mechanical or electric sign. Diagram 1- 19: Working process of fuel dispenser Fuel is sucked from underground tank, enter measurement transducer via vapor separator, and flow out nozzle through solenoid valve. The position movement value of axis generated by transducer is converted into relevant electric pulse sign by sensor, the indicator of electric counter display accumulative volume refueled. If in mechanical fuel dispenser, the volume refue fuel dispenser led can be presented by the indicator device of mechanical counter by measuring the position movement of output axis of converter. The pump of submersible fuel dispenser is installed in oil in tank, which can delivery fuel to several measurement transducers, and flow out nozzle. Its counter device is similar to pump built-in fuel dispenser. The current fuel d fuel dispenser

and responsible supervision of the emission　　tion of the image quality of digital X-ray　　 of time signals and standard frequency with　　detectors which has been successfully com-　　 the DCF long wavelength radio transmitter　　pleted.　　 (see Figure 4).　　 87　　Optics　　With the primary caesium atomic beam which also cover a project to reach the funda-　　clocks and the fountain clock CSF1 which mental quantum limit the quantum projec-　　practically runs in continuous operation the tion noise with an atomic en fuel dispenser semble. This is　　PTB will be well prepared for the near future important in particular for future atomic　　for the realization of the time scales. In con- clocks for which the PTB at present follows　　trast to the caesium clocks based on micro- two different strategies. In addition to the　　wave oscillators future atomic clocks which single stored ion atomic clouds with approxi-　　are proposed to meet the increased require- mately one million ultracold atoms promise　　ments of science and technology will work especially with respect to stability a signal-to-　　with optical oscillators. Last year the PTB noise ratio upon interrogation larger by　　made a breakthrough in the field. Radiation several orders of magnitude and thus a　　of a wavelength of 435 nm from a most stable higher short-time stabilit fuel dispenser y of the optical　　laser system was stabilized in two branches clocks. The higher stability will then again　　in its respective frequency to the same transi- allow smallest systematic frequency shifts to　　tion of two independent stored Yb+ ions. be investigated which limit the accuracy　　With fuel dispenser

ights and Syndication Department in the relevant region World-wide (excluding North America) Rights and Syndication Department 26 Red Lion Square London WC1R 4HQ United Kingdom Tel +44 (0)20 7576 8000 Fax +44 (0)20 7576 8492 E-mail rights@economist.com © 2006 . Regulating business The trial of Sarbanes-Oxley Apr 20th 2006 | NEW YORK From The Economist print edition The corporate regulation brought in after the Enron scandal stands accused of making matters worse Landov DOWN in Houston the Enron trial proceeds apace. But far more significant for business, in America and beyond, than the fate of the energy company s former bosses is the outcome of anothe fuel dispenser r “trial� that is now at a crucial stage—that of the legislation introduced by Congress in 2002 in the wake of the Enron scandal. The act was named after its two main sponsors, Senator Paul Sarbanes (pictured right above) and Congressman Mike Oxley (left). Sarbanes-Oxley, or SOX, as it has become known, was unpopular with business people from the start. In recent years it has been hard to find a chief executive of a public company who does not complain vehemently about the burdens imposed by the dreaded SOX. Indeed, rather than diminish as the initial shock wore off, the complaints have only got louder. The SOX-bashers have been joined by such luminaries as Alan Greenspan, the former head of the Federal Reserve and Bob Greifeld, the boss of the NASDAQ stockmarket. And the critics are not just American. Because of SOX, says Mr Greifeld, “internatio fuel dispenser nal business clearly perceives a ‘problem�with US markets today.� SOX packaged together five different categories of reforms intended to protect investors from future Enrons. First, rules requiring better internal monitoring for potential fraud by a company s board and executives, including making the people at the top certify the quality fuel dispenser